Sat 4 Feb 12:51pm CST
Register | Login
Housing History Repeats Itself

How The New York Times and Time Magazine Got It Wrong

The naysayers and pessimists are out in full force with their doomsday proclamations that homes are no longer a solid investment. The New York Times printed this headline in August, “Housing Fades as a Means to Build Wealth, Analysts Say” and the September issue of Time Magazine has the following cover story: Rethinking Homeownership: Why Owning a Home May No Longer Make Economic Sense. Right now, people are reading these articles and thinking that they shouldn’t buy a home.

Historically, however, booms always follow busts and demand eventually catches up with supply. Add the basic human need for shelter, and the United States is in position for the inevitable — another housing boom.

This isn’t the first time we’ve seen dismal predictions from credible news. Here are a few others:

“The prices of houses seem to have reached a plateau, and there is reasonable expectancy that prices will decline.”  — Time Magazine

“If you are looking to buy, be careful. Rising home values are not a sure thing anymore.” — Miami Herald

“Most economists agree … a home will become little more than a roof and a tax deduction, certainly not the lucrative investment it was.” — Money Magazine

“We’re starting to go back to the time when you bought a home not for its potential money-making abilities, but rather as a nesting spot.” — Los Angeles Times

“Financial planners agree that houses will continue to be a poor investment.” — Kiplinger’s Personal Financial Magazine

Those at the top are buying while land is cheap. Do you want to follow the advice of the media and the masses or do you want to follow the advice of the world’s richest people?

But wait, I forgot to mention the dates. Each of the above quotes was printed between 1947 and 1993. And following each, the markets recovered, and eventually, they boomed. That means they were all wrong. Demand caught up with supply and the economy improved. Those last two quotes came from 1993, the lowest point for real estate values in Los Angeles. I’d be willing to bet that more than a few people heeded that advice, decided not to buy a home in the L.A. area, and then missed out on one of the biggest housing booms in history. Prices in Los Angeles have skyrocketed since.

These predictions are based on emotions and fear rather than fact. Warren Buffett says, “Be greedy when others are fearful and fearful when others are greedy.” That means that the time to buy is when the masses are freaked out and prices are low. History repeats itself. Land has been king for the past 2,000 years — starting with Solomon and going all the way to Warren Buffett.

My dad taught me that if you want to be the best at something, you should copy what the best do. So if you want to be wealthy and successful, you copy the top 10 percent. As one of the world’s richest people, Warren Buffett’s strategy seems to be working out all right for him. Those at the top are buying while land is cheap. Do you want to follow the advice of the media and the masses or do you want to follow the advice of the world’s richest people?

The same New York Times article quotes Stan Humphries, chief economist for the real estate site Zillow, as saying, “housing values will only keep up with inflation. A home will return the money an owner puts in each month, but will not multiply the investment.” He’s wrong. Demand will catch up with the surplus in supply and then the demand will outweigh the supply. We have yet to figure out a way to produce more land, but people still need places to live. It’s one of the few constants in this world. Plus, the population is growing with 4,317,119 babies reportedly born in 2007 (the most recent year available through census reports). That means that around 2027, there will be 4 million people entering the workforce and needing their own places to live. The census also reports an estimated 880,000 immigrants entering the country per year and a projected population increase to “392 million by 2050 — more than a 50 percent increase from the 1990 population size.”

People are bound to panic during busts. They’re bound to give in to their fears and market anxiety. But, as always, housing remains a solid investment.

In addition to the increase in population, there will always be people changing stages in life. In 2008, the U.S. census reported 54,536,000 people between the ages of 50 and 64. These folks are approaching retirement and many will want to downsize and/or move to active adult communities like The Villages in Florida, the largest/most successful retirement community in the nation. Growing families will want more space, newlyweds (the Center for Disease Control reports 2,162,000 marriages in 2008) will look for starter homes, and people relocating or getting new jobs/raises will need to adjust to their new situations. Add that to those entering the workforce from high school and college, and all the demand is bottling up. This puts us in position for another major boom.

Beyond the historical elements and the logic of supply versus demand, there is an emotional demand that drives people to buy homes. Besides the fact that shelter is a basic human need (Maslow’s hierarchy of needs puts it at the base — right there with food, air and sleep); buying a home is an important step in life improvement. A home may mean a better school district or lower stress in a marriage. Psychologists say that buying a home is the third most emotional thing people go through (following giving birth and getting married). Plus, owning a home is owning a piece of America, which has been at the core of the American dream since 1862’s Homestead Act. Homes are a sound financial investment, but if that alone doesn’t motivate people to buy, their emotions will.

People are bound to panic during busts. They’re bound to give in to their fears and market anxiety. But, as always, housing remains a solid investment — not just from the supply and demand standpoint, or the fact that history proves that booms always follow busts, but also because people are emotional and will do whatever it takes to provide for their families.

Jason Forrest is a professional sales trainer, coach and speaker specializing in new home sales. He is the author of Creating Urgency in a Non-Urgent Housing Market and 40 Day Sales Dare for New Home Sales. He can be reached at jason@shoreforrest.com and his website is www.jforrestgroup.com.

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
aliciads1's picture
aliciads1
Fri 3 Sep 11:21am
I am so glad somebody finally took this stance on the subject. All we've been hearing lately is doom and gloom. It's nice to hear the other side.
Steph88's picture
Steph88
Fri 3 Sep 7:11pm
Solomon died almost 3,000 years ago, in fact 2,931 years ago. If you are going to spot facts, at least check them. This article reeks like a BP commercial about there being only "a little" oil in the Gulf. Face it. The days of buying homes for-profit are over. The NY Times article is correct that housing should be treated as long term investment, not retire in 2 years investment. The NY Times article also wasn't written by some schill trying to sell more homes so he can retire early. Also, if housing repeats itself. Why don't we ever learn any lessons? Seems after the 5th or 6th boom-bust cycle we'd learn a thing or two.
Don Lowry's picture
Don Lowry
Sun 12 Sep 12:24pm
Give me a break Steph88. The facts were not the point of the article. The meat and potatoes in the article were awesome!
Steph88's picture
Steph88
Mon 13 Sep 3:04pm
Well, if you can't get facts right how can I believe his "meat and potatoes?" If you are going to quote facts, you need to make sure they are at least logical. I've got some land on the Amazon I'm willing to sell you, it was once Fordlandia and has already been developed. All it needs is a little TLC. Interested? It's a great fixer-upper for you flippers!
James from Florida's picture
James from Florida
Thu 23 Sep 12:43pm
If you are going to write an article accurate Facts are Important! How can you believe the rest of the article if it isn't based on truths. Sorry Don - but content matters!
tony1968's picture
tony1968
Thu 30 Sep 11:58am
Those who lack facts and/or knowldege rant and cast aspersions...much like your post. If its not written by "main stream" media outlets most of the "lemmings" in the world simply follow the news media right off the cliff. Jasaon's article is right in that what the media outlets want you to believe is that everything is doom and gloom. Face it, if a newspaper had a positve story, about anything, no one would read it. As for facts, your entire "comment" lacks any. The article points out the fallacy in the opinions of the NYT article. Since you seem to fixate on the 4,000,000 million baby argument and use that as your "foil", if your supposition about death, gangs, marriage, etc. were true, there never would be any population growth. Moreover, your comments fail to acknowldge that people live longer...thus they need some type of housing longer. By the way, the whole aging population thing adds to the overall population too...just in case that wasn't obvious. This means that there are less homes (for sale or rentals) in the market each year. In addition, the demographics show that there is an obsolecence to housing, and no one mentions the depletion of housing stock in any numbers they cite. Jason, you got it right. For all those who say that people would rather rent when rates are at an all time low, prices are at an all time low, housing costs are rising, rental vacancy rates are at historic (or near historic) lows, they are wrong. Where are these renters goign to find a place?
Steph88's picture
Steph88
Fri 3 Sep 8:12pm
Lets not discount the idiocy of the 4 million babies argument. You failed to factor in death rate, education (or lack of), gangs and drugs, marriage, not leaving home, military,etc. If you believe this "authors" statement that 4.2 million babies will survive, making enough money to afford a home because we all know 20 year olds make enough to buy homes, not get married and everyone moving out of mom and dad's place, then I have some oceanfront property in Oklahoma I need to sell you.
kmc1026's picture
kmc1026
Sat 4 Sep 9:46am
Affordability is at record levels with historically low interst rates and low prices for new homes....if one can afford to buy, NOW is the time! The desire to improve one's life truly has a significant influence over the decision to purchase a new home. Those who choose to wait to buy a home, will only regret not buying in this market.
Wamoo's picture
Wamoo
Sat 4 Sep 2:32pm
Absolute comments like "the days of buying homes for profit are over" are intellectually lazy. The relationship between owning a highly leveraged asset like a home and the profit derived from that asset is not binary (i.e., you will always make money or you won't). Although absolute statements and binary risk/reward explanations are an expedient method of messaging to the masses, the equation is much more complex (entry price, financing terms, quality of the asset, etc). Although you may not agree with the author, Mr. Forrest or the NYT, address the issue, do not spend time on a search engine to find when Solomon died.
DebraMckown's picture
DebraMckown
Sat 4 Sep 2:43pm
I have been involved in real estate and housing directly and indirectly since 1972. I have been through several recessed markets during those years and they have ALWAYS been followed by an upswing in demand and prices. No, buying a house is not a quick turn around investment and Jason did not say that it is was. I agree with Jason that purchasing a home is still a good investment. It may be a long term investment or home prices could go up quickly again. But the bottom line is a home shelters a family, and what better place to shelter a family than ones own home? What other investment gives a tax benefit of this magnitude to most people? The homes purchased in 1972 even after the ups and downs of the housing markets are still valued at more today than then. The joy of home ownership is still alive and well.
sellingtexas's picture
sellingtexas
Tue 7 Sep 4:45pm
Wow, had to comment after reading this! Bold move taking on The New York Times and Time Magazine...and way to go! I'm so tired of hearing all the doom and gloom under the guise of "news". I've been a Marketing Research Analyst and in the New Home Sales Industry for several years now, two things are true: it's always cyclical and there is always demand for shelter. I've read Jason's two books and found he's got a proven technique for actually "creating" the urgency in customers to buy now (hence the name of one of his books, I'm guessing?) The point of the story is obviously that history repeats itself and we can, if we choose to, learn from history, and NOT let it affect us. OR, we can continue to let The New York Times and Time to continue this self-fulfilling prophecy. I'm going to use this article to show my future buyers (the ones that used to be known as my "just looking buyers")!
Huntwood Custom Cabinets's picture
Huntwood Custom Cabinets
Wed 8 Sep 8:09am
Good article and very true
salesgirl's picture
salesgirl
Fri 10 Sep 6:41pm
These are the kinds of articles I find good to read in my line of work. I sometimes forget that things come around again and again. It felt bleak before I read this, but now I realize it was me that was bleak. I will no longer let "the market" be the bad guy. Great reminder that if it's to be, it's up to me!
Don Lowry's picture
Don Lowry
Sun 12 Sep 12:26pm
Great article! There will always be the doom and gloomers out there, no matter what the facts are. We are experiecing great results in our Townhome community in NW Houston. Unfortunately, the bubble was over inflated by greedy sellers and mortgage companies trying to make the quick buck. Well, they did, not prices have settled to where they should have been for the past several years before the inflated figures caused by the boom.
Walter's picture
Walter
Sun 12 Sep 2:09pm
Jason has several great flaws in his argument. According to Michael Snyder's article in the "Business Insider 15 Signs The U.S. Housing Market Is Headed For Complete And Total Collapse " gives the best rebuttal to Jason's argument. "The truth is that this is not a short-term downturn in the housing market. During the past two decades, an insane amount of debt fueled an artificial housing bubble that drove home prices to ridiculous levels. Now the U.S. housing market is trying to correct itself, and no matter how many trillions of dollars the U.S. government throws at the problem the fundamentals of the marketplace are still going to have their way eventually." Jason needs to understand economics. He doesn't seem to understand that this is a unique crisis. Jason is sounding like the used car salesman trying to sell a jalopy. Instead of taking on the New York Times, Time Magazine, Zillow and others he should be studying on how to analyze the market and what realistic trends are occurring. He should be focusing on how sales should not now focus on returns on investment, but stability. Jason also forgets that there is a foreclosure market, existing home market and new homes market that are in direct competition with each other. Buyers are more savvy than Jason understands. They are worried that their home will lose value after purchase. There is less urgency, and more practicality.
Steph88's picture
Steph88
Mon 13 Sep 3:11pm
Don't you understand Walter? Don and Jason have no need for facts, economic trends, and reality. As long as we have thinkers like Don and Jason, as soon as the housing industry seems to rebound they will make sure that they kill any recovery by instantly over-inflating home prices. These folks made money in the boom. Now when it takes real business sense to sell a home, they are lost.
Walter's picture
Walter
Tue 14 Sep 10:07am
Steph I have to wonder if Jason is looking at the industry with rose color glasses. I hope someone will write a coherent article about real facts that can actually help those in this industry. Teaching leadership selling should consist of real world solutions and not just Amway theories equating to sales managers and salespeople just believing in themselves. We are a long way from that idea now. I understand how some in the home building industry are looking for any solutions to the current trends but facts are facts. Jason fails to mention how employment, stock volatility, bonds, US debt, and the world economy (to include the IMF) are effecting spending habits. People no longer have a lot of disposable income, nor do they see housing as an investment. Many homes are underwater and home equity is either lost or very low. Jason states that shelter is a basic human need, but that can be satisfied by renting apartments or homes. I'm not sure what aspect of the real estate business Jason is in but he needs to study and not be ignorant of what is happening around the U.S. and the world economy . His particular market may be fine, but it he is going to write an article for all market areas then he needs to sharpen his intellect and come up with real solid advice. Throwing numbers around about populations is ignorant. Anyone knows that any numbers can be used to try to justify just about anything. Jason, if you want to look back at cycles and history then look at the housing market of the Great Depression. How was the housing market then?
stuclan's picture
stuclan
Tue 14 Sep 9:03am
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-09-13/buffett-rules-out-double-dip-u-... Sorry Steph88, looks like Warren Buffet sides with Jason on this one!
charlesrod's picture
charlesrod
Tue 14 Sep 9:26am
I guess it bears repeating since the message of this article seems to have been missed completely by some posters. Mr. Forrest clearly states "Historically, however, booms always follow busts and demand eventually catches up with supply. Add the basic human need for shelter, and the United States is in position for the inevitable — another housing boom." I didn't see him give a date on when that would happen. He's not making any short-term predictions on the housing market, he just telling us, as it always does, the sun WILL rise again.
James from Florida's picture
James from Florida
Thu 23 Sep 1:01pm
So this article is just gibberish
economy_matters's picture
economy_matters
Thu 16 Sep 12:22pm
I would wager to say that Jason agrees that housing isn't a surefire short-term investment, but that historically, land is a stable long-term investment. We've recovered from even the most devastating busts (The Great Depression) and the logic of the stock market (if you wait long enough, you will see a return) applies to the housing market as well. Check out the housing starts graph from this article, which shows three cycles in the last 50 years: http://www.avidbuilder.com/content/housing-good-gold. I think Jason is basically saying not to panic because in the long run, the market will correct itself.
James from Florida's picture
James from Florida
Thu 23 Sep 1:00pm
And how long? Senior citizens don't have the time to recoup! I doubt that values will ever get back to previous overinflated values and that is good. There needs to be revamping of Freddie and Fannie. The idea that everyone is entitled to owning a home is now over. Our financial sector is changing loan qualifications which is good. I think Jason needs to visit Az and Ca. and look around neighborhoods and see what is really happening. FYI - the new housing stats that came out ticked up because of apartment building starts. This will be the new market.
Jason Forrest's picture
Jason Forrest
Fri 17 Sep 8:15am
Here is a recent article from the Wall Street Journal that talks about the benefits of buying a home. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870337650457549202347113367...
James from Florida's picture
James from Florida
Thu 23 Sep 12:54pm
Read about why owning a home isn't a good idea. Not until the market recovers. Land values and homes are over inflated. People are underwater. I wonder how long Jason thinks it will take to get over this bust? usnews.com/opinion/mzuckerman/articles/2010/09/23/the-american-dream-of-home-ownership-has-become-a-nightmare.html
ericw's picture
ericw
Wed 3 Nov 11:26pm
"Boom cycles follow bust cycles" is a general economic truism, but does not suggest when the current bust cycle will reverse itself and is not useful from a practical advice standpoint. While a number of fans on this site that are presumably associated with the real estate industry and would love to see a rapid rally, the underlying economic facts do not bode well for a speedy recovery. Irrespective of the (relatively) easy credit currently available in the market, the level of pricing correction required to restore the market to a sensible equilibrium is far from present, at least in many Sunbelt states. Consider three macro trends that will continue to exert downward pressure on pricing for the foreseeable future: (1) As a result of easy credit, home ownership rates within the US remain near all-time highs. The proportion of the population that can afford to own vs. rent cannot and will not go higher and, if anything, will trend lower as loan underwriting standards remain strict. As a result, the BEST the industry can hope for is overall demand growth in line with population. In reality, the real growth trend is likely to be far less, as home ownership rates correct toward more sustainable long-term levels. (2) The backlog of foreclosed homes has not yet crested. While the current political administration can pursue policies designed to stave off immediate re-possession, this will only draw out the upcoming wave of foreclosures. Even if select borrowers are able to restructure their existing loans, this will only serve to defer the inevitable. Until common sense prevails and the foreclosure process is allowed to run its course, the inventory of short sale homes and foreclosures will continue to build. The irrational lending exuberance of the mid and late 90's needs to run its course in order to correct the home pricing bubble. (3) Rent vs. buy spreads continue to be unreasonable in many parts of the country. Until thise spreads narrow, either through significant inflation in rental pricing (unlikely with high unemployment) or through deflation in home sales prices, real estate investment growth will be curtailed. Sorry to be a naysayer here, but we're not through this mess yet. That said, the return to rationality will absolute create meaningful opportunities for savvy real estate investors. Desperate times call for desperate measures, and intelligent investors and realtors with reasonable expectations and solid local market knowledge can continue to do well. The slow down in new home construction, while tragic for that industry, also creates some room for optimism. My advice to would-be investors is to stay patient: the days of the quick buck are gone, but an intelligent investing style (i.e., not based on historical comps from the last 4-5 years) can and will yield material returns.